I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Кадр: Video obtained by Reuters
。业内人士推荐WPS下载最新地址作为进阶阅读
title?: string;。业内人士推荐体育直播作为进阶阅读
The new MacBook Pro laptops are as much as $400 more expensive than their predecessors. Thank the RAM shortage.